Home › Guides › Residual Host Cell DNA and HCP Testing Criteria: Where the Numbers Come From and What to Check in Test Methods

Residual Host Cell DNA and HCP Testing Criteria: Where the Numbers Come From and What to Check in Test Methods

Based on the original documents, this guide explains which documents recommend "10 ng/dose" and "approximately 200 bp" for residual host cell DNA and with what scope, and why there is no uniform numerical limit for host cell protein (HCP). It also covers what to check when choosing qPCR and ELISA test methods.

QC & Biosafety Testing · Published 2026.10.09 · Last reviewed 2026.10.09
3 Key Checkpoints
  1. 10 ng/dose and about 200 bp are recommendations, and their scope of application differs from document to document
  2. There is no uniform numerical limit for HCP; it is set product by product
  3. For a test method, check host specificity, limit of quantitation, extraction recovery and antibody coverage

Why Test

Biopharmaceuticals produced in cells may retain DNA and proteins from the production cells. ICH Q6B classifies host cell protein (HCP) and host cell DNA as process-related impurities derived from the cell substrate [1][9]. Residual DNA is controlled because of its potential tumorigenicity and infectivity [2][3], and HCP because it can affect the quality, efficacy and safety of the product [8][9].

Residual DNA: Where the Numbers Come From

DocumentGist of the WordingApplies To
WHO TRS 978 Annex 3 (2013)States that the upper limit in the earlier recommendation (TRS 878) was 10 ng per parenteral dose, and calls for DNA fragment size and inactivation steps to be considered as wellBiological medicinal products made with animal cell substrates
FDA Guidance (2010)For continuous non-tumorigenic cells (e.g. low-passage Vero): less than 10 ng/dose for parenteral administration, less than 100 µg/dose for oral vaccinesViral vaccines for the prevention of infectious diseases
FDA Guidance (2020)Residual DNA from continuous non-tumorigenic cells: less than 10 ng/dose, with size below approximately 200 bpGene therapy investigational new drug applications (INDs)
FDA Points to Consider (1997)100 pg/dose or less where possibleMonoclonal antibodies

Sources: [2][3][4][5]

  • All of the figures above are recommendations, not a single rule that applies to every product. WHO provides that the acceptable limit for each product be set in consultation with the regulatory authority, taking into account the characteristics of the cell substrate, the intended use, and the effect of the process on the size, quantity and activity of the DNA [2].
  • "About 200 bp" is the value the FDA guidance documents give as the size of a functional gene [3][4].
  • If tumorigenic cells (e.g. HEK293) are used, more stringent limits may be needed [3][4].
  • WHO states that some live viral vaccines that are difficult to purify may exceed 10 ng/dose, and that this is an exception to be discussed with the regulatory authority [2].

HCP: There Is No Uniform Numerical Limit

HCP guidance documents do not give a numerical limit; the acceptable level is set product by product according to clinical conditions such as dose and route of administration [9][10]. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Q&A advises that HCP testing is normally included in the drug substance specification and that the upper limit be set at a clinically justified value [8]. Details of HCP test methods are covered in European Pharmacopoeia 2.6.34 and USP <1132> [8][9][10].

Test Methods

  • Residual DNA: quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the most widely used method [7][11]. USP <509> provides a qPCR measurement method, and the extraction procedure that precedes it, for recombinant medicinal products derived from CHO and E. coli [6][7].
  • HCP: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which measures many HCPs at once, is the standard test method [9][12]. Because ELISA antibodies do not recognize every HCP, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), which can identify and quantify individual HCPs, is used alongside it as an orthogonal method (a complementary method based on a different principle) [9][12].

What to Check When Choosing a Test Method or Kit

  • Host specificity: check that the test matches the production cell (CHO, E. coli, HEK293, Vero, etc.) and does not react with DNA from other species [6][11].
  • Sensitivity and limit of quantitation (LOQ): check that it is sufficiently below the target limit on a per-dose basis. The 1997 FDA document suggested a sensitivity at the 10 pg level [5].
  • Extraction recovery: because DNA is extracted from protein-rich samples before measurement, extraction efficiency is checked by spike recovery [7][11].
  • Antibody coverage: how broadly the ELISA antibodies recognize the HCPs of the process in question must be evaluated [8][9][10].
  • Generic and process-specific assays: generic commercial kits are widely used in early development. If coverage is insufficient, a platform or process-specific ELISA is developed, and regulators typically expect this before entry into Phase 3 clinical trials [9][10].

Sources

  1. ICH — Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products (Step 4, 1999-03-10)
  2. WHO — Recommendations for the evaluation of animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological medicinal products and for the characterization of cell banks, TRS 978 Annex 3 (2013)
  3. FDA (CBER) — Guidance for Industry: Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications (2010-02)
  4. FDA (CBER) — Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs), Guidance for Industry (2020-01)
  5. FDA (CBER) — Points to Consider in the Manufacture and Testing of Monoclonal Antibody Products for Human Use (1997-02-28)
  6. USP — General Chapter <509> Residual DNA Testing, USP-NF public preview (year cited: 2019)
  7. Bioprocess Online — USP Chapter Covers Residual DNA Testing Practices For CHO And E. coli, article contributed by USP authors (S. Khedkar, B. De Carvalho) (2024-12-03)
  8. EMA — Questions and answers for biological medicinal products: Host cell proteins testing (HCP item updated 2026-07-20, page updated 2026-09-25)
  9. Pilely K et al. — Monitoring process-related impurities in biologics: host cell protein analysis, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 414(2):747–758 (2022)
  10. BioProcess International (CASSS CMC Strategy Forum report, Shahrokh Z et al.) — Science, Risks, and Regulations: Current Perspectives on Host Cell Protein Analysis and Control (2016-09-15)
  11. Zheng W et al. — Development and Validation of Quantitative Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Residual CHO Host Cell DNA and Optimization of Sample Pretreatment Method in Biopharmaceutical Products, Biological Procedures Online 21:17 (2019)
  12. Zhu-Shimoni J et al. — Host cell protein testing by ELISAs and the use of orthogonal methods, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 111(12):2367–2379 (2014)
This article is a reference summary of published regulations, standards and papers, and does not recommend any particular product. When applying it to an individual process, follow the latest original text of the relevant regulation and the review of your quality unit.
Operated by B2BIO Inc., Bioprocess Division · Report content errors to info@b2bio.co.kr

Ask About Residual DNA & HCP Testing

Tell us the topic of this article and the conditions you are working with now, and we will point you to suitable products and documents.

Ask About Residual DNA & HCP Testing
↑