Home › Guides › What to Check When Choosing a Sterilizing-Grade Filter

What to Check When Choosing a Sterilizing-Grade Filter

A sterilizing-grade filter is defined not by its pore size rating but by a bacterial challenge test and process-specific validation. Based on the original regulatory documents, this guide covers what to check at the selection stage: the grade definition, material compatibility, integrity testing, sizing and supplier documentation.

Filtration & Separation · Published 2026.10.09 · Last reviewed 2026.10.09
3 Key Checkpoints
  1. Sterilizing grade is defined by the bacterial challenge test, not by the pore size number
  2. A standard test report does not replace validation with your own product and process
  3. Integrity test specifications must be linked to bacterial retention data, and pre-use test requirements differ by region

What "Sterilizing Grade" Means

A sterilizing-grade filter is a filter that has been validated to reproducibly remove viable microorganisms from the process fluid and produce a sterile filtrate.[1][2] The nominal pore size is stated as "usually 0.2 µm or smaller" in the U.S. FDA guidance and as "a maximum of 0.22 µm" in EU GMP Annex 1.[1][2] The FDA guidance regards 0.2 µm and 0.22 µm as interchangeable nominal ratings.[1]

However, the grade is not determined by the pore size number alone. The criterion is the bacterial challenge test. When the filter is challenged with at least 10^7 Brevundimonas diminuta (ATCC 19146) per cm² of effective filtration area, the test organism must not pass through.[1][3][4]

Standard Tests and Process-Specific Validation Are Different

ASTM F838-20 is a test method for evaluating the bacterial retention performance of a filter under standard conditions, and it states itself that it is not intended for product- or process-specific validation.[3] Regulatory documents recommend performing bacterial retention testing under worst-case conditions using the actual product (or, where it cannot be used, a justified surrogate fluid).[1][2] A standard test report is therefore the starting point for selection and does not replace validation under your own product and process conditions.[1][3]

Complex testing is often performed by outside laboratories or filter manufacturers, but the filter user is responsible for reviewing whether those data apply to its own product and conditions of use.[1][4]

Membrane Material and Product Compatibility

  • Compatibility: the filter must be compatible with the fluid to be filtered and must not be damaged by the product.[1][2][4]
  • Adsorption: the extent to which product components adsorb to the filter must be evaluated.[2] In a study comparing two sterilizing filters of different materials, the amount of protein adsorbed differed between the filters.[6]
  • Extractables/leachables: components that may migrate from the filter into the product must be evaluated.[2][4]
  • Process conditions: pressure, flow rate, maximum filtration time and temperature are factors that affect filter performance and are addressed in validation.[1][2] The FDA guidance also lists viscosity and surface tension, pH, osmolality and hydraulic shock.[1]

Integrity Testing

An integrity test is a test that checks a filter for damage without destroying it. Bubble point, diffusive flow (or forward flow) and pressure hold tests are used.[1][2][4] The test specification values must be linked to the bacterial retention validation data.[1][2][4]

Both U.S. and European documents recommend performing post-use integrity testing routinely.[1][2] For pre-use testing the wording differs. The FDA guidance states that it "can be performed",[1] while EU GMP Annex 1 (2022) calls for pre-use post-sterilization integrity testing (PUPSIT) to be performed but, where this is not possible due to the process, accepts an alternative on the condition of a thorough risk assessment.[2] The revised Annex 1 of the PIC/S GMP Guide also entered into force on August 25, 2023,[2][5] and in Korea a revision of the GMP notification for sterile medicinal products reflecting the PIC/S standard has been in progress, so the timing of application must be confirmed against the latest original text of the notification.[8][9][10]

Sizing and Conditions of Use

The required filtration area is estimated by small-scale filtration trials with the actual process fluid. One example is the Vmax method, which determines the maximum throughput by measuring flow decay at constant pressure.[6][7] The maximum filtration volume, filtration time and operating pressure are established in validation, and the process is run within those ranges.[1][2] As a rule, sterilizing filters for liquids are discarded after processing one batch, and repeated use requires separate validation.[1][2]

Data to Request from the Supplier

Item to CheckData to Request
Bacterial RetentionStandard challenge test (ASTM F838) data [3][4]
Integrity TestingTest specification values for each wetting fluid and data correlating them with bacterial retention [1][2][4]
ExtractablesExtractables test data [2][4]
CompatibilityMaterial information and chemical compatibility data [1][2]

Sources

  1. U.S. FDA (CDER/CBER/ORA) — Guidance for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current Good Manufacturing Practice (September 2004, final; IX.B Filtration Efficacy)
  2. European Commission — EudraLex Volume 4, EU GMP Annex 1: Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products (C(2022) 5938 final, 2022-08-22; deadline for coming into operation 2023-08-25)
  3. ASTM International — ASTM F838-20, Standard Test Method for Determining Bacterial Retention of Membrane Filters Utilized for Liquid Filtration (2020 edition; sales page shows "Active", Last Updated 2023-08-11)
  4. United States Pharmacopeia — General Chapter <1229.4> Sterilizing Filtration of Liquids (based on the version in USP 38–NF 33; as this is a paid document, the current version needs to be checked separately)
  5. PIC/S — News: Entry into force of revised Annex 1, PIC/S GMP Guide (PE 009-17) (August 2023)
  6. Na J, Suh D, Cho YH, Baek Y — Comparative Evaluation of the Performance of Sterile Filters for Bioburden Protection and Final Fill in Biopharmaceutical Processes, Membranes 12(5):524 (2022, peer-reviewed paper)
  7. Mok Y, Pattnaik P, Raghunath B — Sterilizing-Grade Filter Sizing Based on Permeability, BioProcess International (2012-06-01; trade journal article, authors affiliated with a filter manufacturer — supporting source)
  8. Dailypharm — "Tighter GMP for Sterile Products: Looking for Ways to Reduce the Burden on the Pharmaceutical Industry" (in Korean) (2025-06-10)
  9. Dailypharm — "Tighter GMP for Sterile Products to Take Effect in 2 Years... Contamination Control Strategy Starts Now" (in Korean) (2023-11-01)
  10. MedigateNews — Report on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) administrative pre-announcement of a partial amendment to the "Regulation on Manufacturing and Quality Control of Medicinal Products" (in Korean) (2023-09-08)
This article is a reference summary of published regulations, standards and papers, and does not recommend any particular product. When applying it to an individual process, follow the latest original text of the relevant regulation and the review of your quality unit.
Operated by B2BIO Inc., Bioprocess Division · Report content errors to info@b2bio.co.kr

Ask About Sterilizing Filter Selection

Tell us the topic of this article and the conditions you are working with now, and we will point you to suitable products and documents.

Ask About Sterilizing Filter Selection
↑